![]() ![]() I seriously question the security of any camera hooked up to the Internet. Try as you might to create strong passwords or enroll in multi-factor authentication, there's always the distinct possibility that someone could hitchhike onto your home network - normally done via a device that isn't getting regular security updates - and use credential or packet sniffer tools to access the camera feed. I also seriously question the security of any camera hooked up to the Internet. Having a shutter that only opens when the camera is recording or being viewed - or when the cameras are set to away mode - would deliver significant peace of mind. Physical shutters have become more commonplace on devices like an Amazon Echo Show but are strangely missing from other cameras that are always plugged in. Sure, most (if not all) indoor cameras have a small LED that lights up when recording, but do you trust that the LED is always on when someone is viewing the feed? Even if I know better because of a technical reason, there's always a doubt in my mind that the camera could be recording without me knowing. There's always doubt in my mind that an indoor camera isn't recording me all the time.Īrguably the biggest issue is a complete lack of any significant physical identifiers that a camera is recording. Whether it's strangers talking to your kids through your camera - via access that was provided by a data breach or another method - or even sextortion scams that claim to have footage of you sans clothing, indoor cameras are a scary bargain to make. ![]() Over the years, we've seen countless examples of indoor security cameras exhibiting behavior that can be described as anything but secure. Before we dive into those points, however, let's take a look at why indoor cameras are, generally, a bad idea. Instead of looking at these as negatives, I challenge you to view them as the best possible combination of positive points we could have gotten for a product such as this. Five-minute battery life, the inability to manually control the drone yourself, no support for multi-story homes, loud fans that could verge on being obnoxious, no speaker or microphone on board, and a navigation algorithm that'll land the drone if it's ever unsure of the location or flight conditions (instead of trying to figure it out). The latest information we have on Ring's home drone looks, at least on paper, like the typical shortcomings of a first-generation product. Ring is still playing this one close to the proverbial chest, and that's for the best given the sensitive nature of the feelings that people get when they think about a done-mounted camera flying around their homes.īut here's the deal: many of the negative thoughts surrounding a Ring-branded home drone were formed on a lack of facts, or the worry that the product could be used in a way that we've learned is physically impossible. There, it finally gave customers a chance to sign up for a chance to buy the device, meaning it wasn't ready for the full-scale rollout just yet. This year, Ring re-debuted the Ring Always Home Cam at the Amazon September 2021 event. Many of the negative thoughts worry that the product could be used in a way that we've learned is physically impossible. Controversy waned with time and Ring looks like it used feedback from the outrage to ensure that its eventual debut was met with little more than quiet approval. Little more than rumors of its demise spread among those still interested but the rest of the tech verse seemed to have largely forgotten about its existence. Many of them focused on prior Ring privacy scandals - ones the company had finally been able to put behind them with many structural changes and clever marketing - yet, here was a product that seemed to literally fly in the face of all that progress.įor a full year, Ring went radio silent on the Ring Always Home Cam. Ring Always Home Cam's original debut in September 2020 sparked countless editorials and commentary revolving around the clearly sinister concept of Ring and Amazon putting a drone in your home. ![]() Source: Ring (Image credit: Source: Ring) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |